Previous Page  100 / 252 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 100 / 252 Next Page
Page Background

EINSTEIN ALBERT

 (1879-1955).

Autograph MANUSCRIPT, signed « A. Einstein », [circa

1930?] ; 3 pages in-4 format (splitting along folds; a few

small tears to margins); in German.

10 000 / 15 000 €

Important scientific manuscript. A report on the properties of alpha-,

beta-, gamma- and x-radiation, with respect to their application in

medicine.

A working manuscript in five numbered sections (“I...II...III...IV...V”)

containing a number of autograph deletions and additions in the first

section. There is a later autograph attestation of authenticity at the end

dated [1952]. This note of authentication by Einstein at the end of the

manuscript indicates that this untitled report originated in answer to

a series of questions from the medical fraternity (“von medizinischer

Seite”), but from whom and when exactly he was no longer able to

recall. It seems likely, to judge from the paper and handwriting, that

this report was written sometime during Einstein’s Berlin years (1914-

1932), possibly towards the end of that period.

Einstein considers the different absorption properties of [alpha]- and

[beta]-rays as compared with [gamma]- and x-rays, and summarizes

the physical results of the various forms of radiation; the relatively

weak penetration-capacity of [alpha]-radiation is assessed in the

following section; in the third part of the report, Einstein expatiates

on the duration of the radiation process, noting that in the case of

cancer cells a longer period of radiation might be efficacious, modestly

adding that he is not in a position to judge whether this true, and

advising that further empirical work be done; in the fourth section,

Einstein considers the effectiveness of specially constructed, thin-

walled, ionisation chambers for the proposes of radiation, but notes

that his remarks here are ‘very uncertain’ (“sehr unsicher”), given that

he is unacquainted with the experimental work in this area; in the

fifth and final section of the report, he remarks on the likely effect of

secondary (beta) rays on tissue to be treated.

Détail du lot 64