Previous Page  11 / 198 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 198 Next Page
Page Background

10

The conception of such illustrations is to endow perspective and painting more generally with

status – not as a material craft but as a “liberal art” that has rational and even scientific foundations.

Paintingcanjustlybeseenbranchofpracticalmathematics,akintomusicwithitsPythagoreanharmonies.

Some of the books, most notably German ones of the 16

th

century, regale us with surreal compositions

of geometrical solids of an regular and bizarre kind, as a kind of plastic music.*

2

We can extend the

intellectual motivation that drives such pages more broadly to the agendas of the academies of art that

rose across Europe following the lead of the Florentine Academia del Disegno in 1563. The message

was also directed to a broader society, not least via royal and powerful patrons, as typified by the

dedication of a number of the grander books. At telling example is Joshua Kirby’s publication in 1754

of the perspective system of Brook Taylor, a noted mathematician. The resulting volume with its witty

frontispiece by Hogarth was dedicated to George III*

3

.

The introductions that the authors provided for their volumes typically mirror the implicit intellectual

claims of the frontispiece and social aspirations of the dedication. The idea is to show that art is a

learned discipline. Authors characteristically claim that what is to follow surpasses other treatises in

novelty, optical and geometrical accuracy, intelligibility and practicality

Some basic geometry and sometimes some basic optics typically follows, though more of the former

than the latter. There may well be some basic Euclid, especially of simple geometrical shapes, basic

constructions such as similar triangles, and three-dimensional illustrations of geometrical solids (most

notably the five regular or “Platonic” polyhedra).*

4

The Euclidian and Platonic connotations were

useful and served to make a philosophical point about the “ideal” status of geometry and therefore of

art. Next we would expect to witness the basic geometry of projecting simple forms that are behind

the picture plane on to that plane, given a fixed point located at a given distance from the front of

the plane. The really serious books depict compound solids in perspective and show how the ground

plans and elevation of a complex objects, especially architectural components or whole buildings, can

be projected at any given angle on to the picture surface. We might expect on occasion to find provide

alternative and abbreviated methods, some aimed at encouraging young devotees.

There are some set-piece examples that recur across the treatises, acting like five-finger exercises on

the piano. Early Italian examples include mazzocchi, the facetted doughnut frames that supported

voluminous hats, first illustrated by Uccello and Piero della Francesca*

5

. Lutes are favourite subjects,

portrayed at various angles.*

6

Spiral staircases - a real challenge - serve to certify the author’s

competence.*

7

We find pictures of optical instruments, most obviously in books that discuss

surveying*

8

and even artists’ easels*

9

. There are also arrays of the letters of the alphabet depicted as

sculptural objects and placed in diverse orientations.*

10

The choices seem to be based upon stock ideas

of what a trained perspectivist was expected to accomplish.

A number of treatises deal in more detail with the issue of placing complex semi-regular or irregular

forms, most notably the human body, systematically foreshortened as if seen from the fixed viewpoint.

The most accurate method was to project the human body in plan and elevation, as demonstrated

by Cousin,*

11

but there was also a short-hand technique of reducing figures to a series of box-like

components within which the detailed forms could be foreshortened.*

12

Complementing the projections of the bodies, a number of the treatises deal with the geometry of

shadows cast by various bodies under illumination from given sources of light.*

13

Mechanical or optical devices or instruments for the achieving of perspective constructions in an

automated manner are illustrated and discussed by some of the authors. The simplest are the glass and

“veil”, which allow the direct transcription of the seen thing from a fixed view point on to a flat surface*

14

.

*

2

184, 345

*

3

348

*

4

1, 14, 25, 26, 72, 83, 90-92, 164, 167, 259, 357

*

5

282

*

6

1

*

7

17, 80

*

8

2, 22, 93, 95, 263, 277, 278

*

9

183, 330

*

10

61, 213

*

11

87-89

*

12

209, 304

*

13

35, 107, 110

*

14

103, 195